تجاوز إلى المحتوى الرئيسي
  • دخول/تسجيل
07-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English

استمارة البحث

  • الرئيسية
  • من نحن
    • السلطة القضائية
    • الأجهزة القضائية
    • الرؤية و الرسالة
    • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
  • رؤساء القضاء
    • رئيس القضاء الحالي
    • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
  • القرارات
  • الادارات
    • إدارة التدريب
    • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
    • إدارة التوثيقات
    • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
    • ادارة خدمات القضاة
    • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
    • المكتب الفني
    • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
    • شرطة المحاكم
  • الخدمات الإلكترونية
    • البريد الالكتروني
    • الدليل
    • المكتبة
    • خدمات التقاضي
    • خدمات التوثيقات
    • خدمات عامة
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
    • معرض الصور
    • معرض الفيديو
  • خدمات القضاة
  • اتصل بنا
    • اتصل بنا
    • تقديم طلب/شكوى
  • دخول/تسجيل

استمارة البحث

07-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English
    • الرئيسية
    • من نحن
      • السلطة القضائية
      • الأجهزة القضائية
      • الرؤية و الرسالة
      • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
    • رؤساء القضاء
      • رئيس القضاء الحالي
      • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
    • القرارات
    • الادارات
      • إدارة التدريب
      • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
      • إدارة التوثيقات
      • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
      • ادارة خدمات القضاة
      • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
      • المكتب الفني
      • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
      • شرطة المحاكم
    • الخدمات الإلكترونية
      • البريد الالكتروني
      • الدليل
      • المكتبة
      • خدمات التقاضي
      • خدمات التوثيقات
      • خدمات عامة
    • المكتبة التفاعلية
      • معرض الصور
      • معرض الفيديو
    • خدمات القضاة
    • اتصل بنا
      • اتصل بنا
      • تقديم طلب/شكوى
  • دخول/تسجيل

استمارة البحث

07-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English
      • الرئيسية
      • من نحن
        • السلطة القضائية
        • الأجهزة القضائية
        • الرؤية و الرسالة
        • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
      • رؤساء القضاء
        • رئيس القضاء الحالي
        • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
      • القرارات
      • الادارات
        • إدارة التدريب
        • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
        • إدارة التوثيقات
        • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
        • ادارة خدمات القضاة
        • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
        • المكتب الفني
        • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
        • شرطة المحاكم
      • الخدمات الإلكترونية
        • البريد الالكتروني
        • الدليل
        • المكتبة
        • خدمات التقاضي
        • خدمات التوثيقات
        • خدمات عامة
      • المكتبة التفاعلية
        • معرض الصور
        • معرض الفيديو
      • خدمات القضاة
      • اتصل بنا
        • اتصل بنا
        • تقديم طلب/شكوى

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1966
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

 (major Court confirmation)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

ACCP-531-1964

 Principles

·  Criminal law-payment of dia (blood money)- Recommendation for payment of dia should be made by application by both accused and deceased’s relatives to the Court

Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s,  Code ,s,253. and sentence to six years imprisonment. The trial Court recommended that if dia is paid according to the custom of the locally, the sentence be reduced to three years.
Held: Finding under Penal Code, s,  253, is confirmed , but the recommendation by the Court for commutation of sentence if dia is paid is rejected because such recommendation should not be made unless the application is submitted to the court by both the accused and relatives of deceased.
 

Judgment

 

Babikeer Awadalla , Acting C.J.November 29,1964;I am confirming

finding and sentence in this case but reject the recommendation for commutation of the sentece if dia be paid.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, I think that  a very light sentence was passed and that to allow ay further reduction even on payment of dia would make the sentence highly inadequate.

The Court is referring to the “customary dia” What is the customary enlightened in cases of this sort on (a) what the normal amount is , Furthermore, in no case should such a recommendation be made unless an application by both the accused and the relatives of the deceased is submitted to the Court. Dia is an archaic form of expiation of crime which in my view is highly inconsistent with modern conceptions of Criminal punishment and its indiscriminate recognition should be curtailed. It may not be harmful inn those cases where it would not arouse the indignation of relatives of he deceased or society at large but it should in no case be allowed to interfere with the deterrent element of punishment and its payment should to allow accused to get away with term of imprisonment that would be incommensurate with the heinousness of homicide.

Lastly , the recommendation should appear in separate letter giving all the necessary dtalils and not on the sentence sheet.

 

Editors, Note-See Criminal Court Circular 1952 No. 18 (4).

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. DIKRAN K. HAYGOIJNI فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. FATHER LEWIS BUFFONI ◂

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1966
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

 (major Court confirmation)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

ACCP-531-1964

 Principles

·  Criminal law-payment of dia (blood money)- Recommendation for payment of dia should be made by application by both accused and deceased’s relatives to the Court

Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s,  Code ,s,253. and sentence to six years imprisonment. The trial Court recommended that if dia is paid according to the custom of the locally, the sentence be reduced to three years.
Held: Finding under Penal Code, s,  253, is confirmed , but the recommendation by the Court for commutation of sentence if dia is paid is rejected because such recommendation should not be made unless the application is submitted to the court by both the accused and relatives of deceased.
 

Judgment

 

Babikeer Awadalla , Acting C.J.November 29,1964;I am confirming

finding and sentence in this case but reject the recommendation for commutation of the sentece if dia be paid.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, I think that  a very light sentence was passed and that to allow ay further reduction even on payment of dia would make the sentence highly inadequate.

The Court is referring to the “customary dia” What is the customary enlightened in cases of this sort on (a) what the normal amount is , Furthermore, in no case should such a recommendation be made unless an application by both the accused and the relatives of the deceased is submitted to the Court. Dia is an archaic form of expiation of crime which in my view is highly inconsistent with modern conceptions of Criminal punishment and its indiscriminate recognition should be curtailed. It may not be harmful inn those cases where it would not arouse the indignation of relatives of he deceased or society at large but it should in no case be allowed to interfere with the deterrent element of punishment and its payment should to allow accused to get away with term of imprisonment that would be incommensurate with the heinousness of homicide.

Lastly , the recommendation should appear in separate letter giving all the necessary dtalils and not on the sentence sheet.

 

Editors, Note-See Criminal Court Circular 1952 No. 18 (4).

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. DIKRAN K. HAYGOIJNI فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. FATHER LEWIS BUFFONI ◂

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1966
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

 (major Court confirmation)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. EL DEGEIL SAEED HASSAN

ACCP-531-1964

 Principles

·  Criminal law-payment of dia (blood money)- Recommendation for payment of dia should be made by application by both accused and deceased’s relatives to the Court

Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s,  Code ,s,253. and sentence to six years imprisonment. The trial Court recommended that if dia is paid according to the custom of the locally, the sentence be reduced to three years.
Held: Finding under Penal Code, s,  253, is confirmed , but the recommendation by the Court for commutation of sentence if dia is paid is rejected because such recommendation should not be made unless the application is submitted to the court by both the accused and relatives of deceased.
 

Judgment

 

Babikeer Awadalla , Acting C.J.November 29,1964;I am confirming

finding and sentence in this case but reject the recommendation for commutation of the sentece if dia be paid.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case, I think that  a very light sentence was passed and that to allow ay further reduction even on payment of dia would make the sentence highly inadequate.

The Court is referring to the “customary dia” What is the customary enlightened in cases of this sort on (a) what the normal amount is , Furthermore, in no case should such a recommendation be made unless an application by both the accused and the relatives of the deceased is submitted to the Court. Dia is an archaic form of expiation of crime which in my view is highly inconsistent with modern conceptions of Criminal punishment and its indiscriminate recognition should be curtailed. It may not be harmful inn those cases where it would not arouse the indignation of relatives of he deceased or society at large but it should in no case be allowed to interfere with the deterrent element of punishment and its payment should to allow accused to get away with term of imprisonment that would be incommensurate with the heinousness of homicide.

Lastly , the recommendation should appear in separate letter giving all the necessary dtalils and not on the sentence sheet.

 

Editors, Note-See Criminal Court Circular 1952 No. 18 (4).

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. DIKRAN K. HAYGOIJNI فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. FATHER LEWIS BUFFONI ◂
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©