CHRISTOS SIMOS v. HASSAN MOHAMED DAOUD
Case No.:
AC.APP-331956-
Court:
Court of Appeal
Issue No.:
1961
Principles
Judgment
(COURT OF APPEAL)
CHRISTOS SIMOS v. HASSAN MOHAMED DAOUD
AC.APP-331956-
Advocate: J. E. Candioglou………… for the applicant
R. C. Soni J. July 14, 1957 :—A review is normally granted:
(i) when new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the applicant or could not be produced by him when the decree or order was made; or
(2) on account of some mistakes or error apparent on the face of the record.
If the application falls within these two categories a review may be granted. If it does not it may still be granted if there is other sufficient cause.
* Court M. A. .Abu Rannnt Cf., M. 1. El Nur J. and P. C. Soni J.
In the present case the error was referred to in the original application. and replied to by the other side (see reply dated January 12, 1957. page IV. under heading Issue ).
In these circumstances the applicant cannot appeal to “other sufficient cause.” There is no sufficient cause. The matter in dispute was examined and decided upon. A decision which a party thinks is wrong is no ground for a review.
I find the application for review to be without substance, and I would dismiss it.
M. I. El Nur 1. July 15, 1957:—I agree.
M. A. Abu Rannat 1. July 16, 19 agree. Application for review is summarily dismissed

