تجاوز إلى المحتوى الرئيسي
  • دخول/تسجيل
08-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English

استمارة البحث

  • الرئيسية
  • من نحن
    • السلطة القضائية
    • الأجهزة القضائية
    • الرؤية و الرسالة
    • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
  • رؤساء القضاء
    • رئيس القضاء الحالي
    • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
  • القرارات
  • الادارات
    • إدارة التدريب
    • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
    • إدارة التوثيقات
    • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
    • ادارة خدمات القضاة
    • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
    • المكتب الفني
    • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
    • شرطة المحاكم
  • الخدمات الإلكترونية
    • البريد الالكتروني
    • الدليل
    • المكتبة
    • خدمات التقاضي
    • خدمات التوثيقات
    • خدمات عامة
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
    • معرض الصور
    • معرض الفيديو
  • خدمات القضاة
  • اتصل بنا
    • اتصل بنا
    • تقديم طلب/شكوى
  • دخول/تسجيل

استمارة البحث

08-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English
    • الرئيسية
    • من نحن
      • السلطة القضائية
      • الأجهزة القضائية
      • الرؤية و الرسالة
      • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
    • رؤساء القضاء
      • رئيس القضاء الحالي
      • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
    • القرارات
    • الادارات
      • إدارة التدريب
      • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
      • إدارة التوثيقات
      • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
      • ادارة خدمات القضاة
      • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
      • المكتب الفني
      • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
      • شرطة المحاكم
    • الخدمات الإلكترونية
      • البريد الالكتروني
      • الدليل
      • المكتبة
      • خدمات التقاضي
      • خدمات التوثيقات
      • خدمات عامة
    • المكتبة التفاعلية
      • معرض الصور
      • معرض الفيديو
    • خدمات القضاة
    • اتصل بنا
      • اتصل بنا
      • تقديم طلب/شكوى
  • دخول/تسجيل

استمارة البحث

08-04-2026
  • العربية
  • English
      • الرئيسية
      • من نحن
        • السلطة القضائية
        • الأجهزة القضائية
        • الرؤية و الرسالة
        • الخطط و الاستراتيجية
      • رؤساء القضاء
        • رئيس القضاء الحالي
        • رؤساء القضاء السابقين
      • القرارات
      • الادارات
        • إدارة التدريب
        • إدارة التفتيش القضائي
        • إدارة التوثيقات
        • إدارة تسجيلات الاراضي
        • ادارة خدمات القضاة
        • الأمانة العامة لشؤون القضاة
        • المكتب الفني
        • رئاسة ادارة المحاكم
        • شرطة المحاكم
      • الخدمات الإلكترونية
        • البريد الالكتروني
        • الدليل
        • المكتبة
        • خدمات التقاضي
        • خدمات التوثيقات
        • خدمات عامة
      • المكتبة التفاعلية
        • معرض الصور
        • معرض الفيديو
      • خدمات القضاة
      • اتصل بنا
        • اتصل بنا
        • تقديم طلب/شكوى

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1961
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

Case No.:

AC-CP.21 1-1956

Court:

Major Court Confirmation

Issue No.:

1961

 

Principles

·  Criminal Law—Penal Code, s. 44 of fact—Accused killed deceased thinking he was a beast—Penal Code, S. 255. conviction quashed

Accused heard something moving in the dark and in good faith believed it to be a wild beast. He threw his spear at the moving shadow which turned out to be his brother-in-law who died of the wound. Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s. 255.
Held: Conviction is quashed under Penal Code. s. 44: because accused believed in good faith that he was spearing a wild beast, when he killed deceased, his act was done under a mistake of fact and constitutes no offence.
Salient facts as found by Yahia Omran, Magistrate of the First Class, President of the Major Court Convened at Yambio, September 10, 1956:
Deceased is accused’s brother-in-law. He was blind. He went to accused’s house to chat.
It was midnight when accused left the house to ease nature. Deceased went out a short time later for the same purpose.
As accused was returning back to the house, he heard something moving in the cultivation close to his house. He threw his spear at the moving shadow and he was surprised to hear the voice of the deceased crying out. He with P.W. 3 and 4 removed him to the house where he remained suffering from the wound sustained, for about three weeks and at last died. Deceased’s body was buried three days before the police arrived.

Judgment

 

(MAJOR COURT CONFIRMATION)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

AC-CP.21 1-1956

M. I. El-Nur, Acting C.J. September 19. 1956:—I refused confirmation of the finding by the court of accused Mejei Mbele guilty of an offence under Penal Code, s. 255. as well as the sentence of imprisonment for five years, and have ordered that the accused shall be set at liberty forthwith.

Accused speared deceased in pitch darkness inside cultivation in the forest, believing in good faith that the object of his assault was not a

human being, but a wild beast. His act is therefore covered by Penal code, s.44 , and constitutes no offence.

( Editor.s note: See opinion of Soni J. in Sudan Government v. Abdullah Mukhtar Nur (1959) S.L.J.R. I, 2-3 )

 

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MARIAKA BERE فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MOHAMED AHMED GADIR] ◂

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1961
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

Case No.:

AC-CP.21 1-1956

Court:

Major Court Confirmation

Issue No.:

1961

 

Principles

·  Criminal Law—Penal Code, s. 44 of fact—Accused killed deceased thinking he was a beast—Penal Code, S. 255. conviction quashed

Accused heard something moving in the dark and in good faith believed it to be a wild beast. He threw his spear at the moving shadow which turned out to be his brother-in-law who died of the wound. Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s. 255.
Held: Conviction is quashed under Penal Code. s. 44: because accused believed in good faith that he was spearing a wild beast, when he killed deceased, his act was done under a mistake of fact and constitutes no offence.
Salient facts as found by Yahia Omran, Magistrate of the First Class, President of the Major Court Convened at Yambio, September 10, 1956:
Deceased is accused’s brother-in-law. He was blind. He went to accused’s house to chat.
It was midnight when accused left the house to ease nature. Deceased went out a short time later for the same purpose.
As accused was returning back to the house, he heard something moving in the cultivation close to his house. He threw his spear at the moving shadow and he was surprised to hear the voice of the deceased crying out. He with P.W. 3 and 4 removed him to the house where he remained suffering from the wound sustained, for about three weeks and at last died. Deceased’s body was buried three days before the police arrived.

Judgment

 

(MAJOR COURT CONFIRMATION)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

AC-CP.21 1-1956

M. I. El-Nur, Acting C.J. September 19. 1956:—I refused confirmation of the finding by the court of accused Mejei Mbele guilty of an offence under Penal Code, s. 255. as well as the sentence of imprisonment for five years, and have ordered that the accused shall be set at liberty forthwith.

Accused speared deceased in pitch darkness inside cultivation in the forest, believing in good faith that the object of his assault was not a

human being, but a wild beast. His act is therefore covered by Penal code, s.44 , and constitutes no offence.

( Editor.s note: See opinion of Soni J. in Sudan Government v. Abdullah Mukhtar Nur (1959) S.L.J.R. I, 2-3 )

 

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MARIAKA BERE فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MOHAMED AHMED GADIR] ◂

مجلة الاحكام

  • المجلات من 1900 إلي 1930
  • المجلات من 1931 إلي 1950
  • المجلات من 1956 إلي 1959
  • المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  • المجلات من 1970 إلي 1979
  • المجلات من 1980 إلي 1989
  • المجلات من 1990 إلي 1999
  • المجلات من 2000 إلي 2009
  • المجلات من 2010 الى 2019
  • المجلات من 2020 الى 2029
  1. مجلة الاحكام
  2. المجلات من 1960 إلي 1969
  3. Contents of the Sudan Law Journal . 1961
  4. SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

Case No.:

AC-CP.21 1-1956

Court:

Major Court Confirmation

Issue No.:

1961

 

Principles

·  Criminal Law—Penal Code, s. 44 of fact—Accused killed deceased thinking he was a beast—Penal Code, S. 255. conviction quashed

Accused heard something moving in the dark and in good faith believed it to be a wild beast. He threw his spear at the moving shadow which turned out to be his brother-in-law who died of the wound. Accused was convicted under Penal Code, s. 255.
Held: Conviction is quashed under Penal Code. s. 44: because accused believed in good faith that he was spearing a wild beast, when he killed deceased, his act was done under a mistake of fact and constitutes no offence.
Salient facts as found by Yahia Omran, Magistrate of the First Class, President of the Major Court Convened at Yambio, September 10, 1956:
Deceased is accused’s brother-in-law. He was blind. He went to accused’s house to chat.
It was midnight when accused left the house to ease nature. Deceased went out a short time later for the same purpose.
As accused was returning back to the house, he heard something moving in the cultivation close to his house. He threw his spear at the moving shadow and he was surprised to hear the voice of the deceased crying out. He with P.W. 3 and 4 removed him to the house where he remained suffering from the wound sustained, for about three weeks and at last died. Deceased’s body was buried three days before the police arrived.

Judgment

 

(MAJOR COURT CONFIRMATION)

SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MEJEI MBELE

AC-CP.21 1-1956

M. I. El-Nur, Acting C.J. September 19. 1956:—I refused confirmation of the finding by the court of accused Mejei Mbele guilty of an offence under Penal Code, s. 255. as well as the sentence of imprisonment for five years, and have ordered that the accused shall be set at liberty forthwith.

Accused speared deceased in pitch darkness inside cultivation in the forest, believing in good faith that the object of his assault was not a

human being, but a wild beast. His act is therefore covered by Penal code, s.44 , and constitutes no offence.

( Editor.s note: See opinion of Soni J. in Sudan Government v. Abdullah Mukhtar Nur (1959) S.L.J.R. I, 2-3 )

 

▸ SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MARIAKA BERE فوق SUDAN GOVERNMENT v. MOHAMED AHMED GADIR] ◂
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©
  • الرئيسية
  • السلطة القضائية
  • رئيس القضاء
  • الأخبار
  • المكتبة التفاعلية
  • اتصل بنا
  • خريطة الموقع
جميع الحقوق للسلطة القضائية السودانية 2026 ©